Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Interview with Manmohan Vaidya, RSS prachar pramukh


‘Let their guilt be proved first

Manmohan Vaidya: “Therehave been attempts time and again to defame and discredit the RSS.”

The RSS being a cadre-based organisation, how do you view the latest revelations about its activists being involved in terrorist activities?

First, let me correct the notion that those said to have been exposed are Sangh activists. Not a single Sangh leader or pracharak or active member has been found to be involved in such activities so far even by the CBI. As for the latest sting operation [by a television channel], it features somebody who is not our member anymore. The RSS' name was unnecessarily dragged into this controversy by overzealous TV channels. The Sangh is a peace-loving organisation, we do not believe in any type of violence and in fact condemn violence in the strongest possible words. If any Sangh member has ever been found guilty, we will not try and defend such people. Action must be taken against them, but in the name of action, they should not be harassed unnecessarily even before their guilt has been proved. Let their guilt be proved first. Do not declare them guilty without even a shred of evidence. So far there is no evidence of any active Sangh leader being involved in terrorist activities.

But people like Sadhvi Pragya and Lt Col S.P. Purohit drew their ideological inspiration from the RSS. How do you justify their involvement in terrorist activities?

They might have drawn their inspiration from the Sangh ideology, but they were not active Sangh members. The Sangh is an open organisation, people come in and walk out all the time. What people do after they leave us is not our responsibility. Following the Sangh ideology of promoting Hindutva throughout one's life needs patience, creativity and commitment. There might be elements who lack these qualities and they would certainly get disillusioned if they do not see immediate gains and may take recourse to deviant activities like indulging in terrorist activities. But that does not mean the RSS as a whole should be dubbed a terrorist organisation. There have been attempts time and again to defame and discredit the RSS, and every time we have proved these theories wrong. Our patriotism and selfless service to the nation is accepted by even those who are ideologically opposed to us.

But the perception that is gaining ground is that the RSS, by not adequately condemning violence by its sympathisers, supports violence, and this perception has given credence to theories of Hindu terrorism. How do you plan to counter this perception?

The RSS has never supported and will never support violence in any form. As for the term Hindu terrorism, it is a misnomer. How can you club an entire community with the concept of terrorism? Does anybody in this country dare talk of Muslim terrorism? Coining such terms is a conspiracy to defame the Sangh. It is a political conspiracy to defeat and defame Hindutva forces. In order to garner Muslim votes, vested interests are playing communal and divisive politics. We will not let this conspiracy succeed. If need be, we will go to the people, make them aware, run campaigns, approach the media, and our senior leaders will directly talk to the people. Theories like Hindu terrorism are coined by those in the government who have failed to curb the larger menace of terrorism in the country. It is nothing but a diversionary tactic to deflect attention from their own failures. But people know us. They know that the Sangh believes in sadhna.

Even if, as you say, this is a temporary phase meant to discredit the Sangh, would it not harm the BJP politically as long as it lasts?

True, it draws inspiration from us, but the BJP is a political party led by politically mature people, and they know what is to be done in these circumstances. We are not supposed to tell them what they should do or should not. They should be able to manage their affairs, and I am sure they will be able to manage it well.

But is it not a fact that the BJP is paying a political price for controversies involving the Sangh?

Possible, but it is for them to see how they can counter it.

http://www.flonnet.com/stories/20100813271601900.htm

1 comment:

  1. NAMASTE
    Very good day, honorable Mr. Ram Vaidya

    Highly respected Lord. I stand before you and the group leader, my name is Edwin Wilfredo Lopez Pulido.
    I was born in Motavita, Boyacá, Colombia (South America). I have 30 years. For 16 years I've been knowing about Vedic Science and Sanatana Dharma in India. I know of several teachers, but formally follow the teachings of Sri Aurobindo. Always my sincere and ardent desire has been to serve Mother India, in every way possible. Actually there are many things to do in this country and the different Indian communities around the world. I have also carefully studied the diversity of groups working for this great cause, ideal, and certainly your organization happens to be one of the best. You embody everything that I aspire to find an organization that serves well to Mother India. I congratulate you sincerely.
    I am writing because I recently developed a comprehensive plan that aims to "unite all the Indians around a common cause: to take the best of India to the world and bring the best in the world to India." The name of this Plan is: "India, global Vedic Nation" and consists of 18 large projects. This will be funded entirely by Mr. Gerardo de la Torre, a Spanish billionaire who, like me, communion with Indian nationalism, but from a spiritual perspective given by Sri Aurobindo. This person has created an organization, "the Second Foundation (Earth)", to spread the Vedic supreme ideal of life and the profound teachings of Sri Aurobindo in the West.

    To give a first good step approach ... the idea here submit to you, is to be allowed to speak through Skype, a delegate in London that you see fit to send on your behalf, or if applicable, with you directly, in order to provide a full explanation of the plan I have drawn, and if this really that interesting, useful and feasible, then consider that a select committee of your organization in London travel to Madrid (Spain) meet directly at a desk, me and the director of the "Second Foundation". Established a negotiating table with the most qualified translators ... will discuss possible ways in which both organizations could mutually colaborarse together to work (together) in the realization of the common cause that unites us, taking to the occasion, as a reference the plan: "India: Global Vedic nation"

    If things go well, you would work in India giving us guidance, advice, support and spaces that they deem appropriate to carry out this great work. Spanish Foundation that I represent, will provide all necessary monetary resources.

    I'm sure this case will be of interest and its directors in London that song before we may contact in order to reach a happy agreement.

    Thanks for your support and kind attention.

    Pranam
    jahsekinah2000@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete